Animals Exploited Need Protection

Tell USDA to Do Its Job!


Activate for Animals


Having no voice, animals need and deserve protection from the industries that use and exploit them, and it’s the job of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to protect their welfare. The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) requires USDA to inspect animal dealers, breeders, exhibitions, and laboratories to help assure that animals are provided minimal standards of care and treatment. Despite the law, however, USDA has indicated a willingness to skirt on its responsibility to protect animal welfare by adopting a system that would permit third parties to perform inspections, which could be used to reduce oversight by the USDA.

Such a move would compromise animal welfare and that is unacceptable!

There are serious concerns surrounding third-party inspections, such as conflicts of interest if industry groups become empowered to help their fee-paying members avoid USDA inspections. Industry group information forms and site visits are confidential, so the public won’t have access to information that is currently available through USDA, reducing transparency and public accountability. It’s also important to note that when an animal at a dealer, breeder, zoo, or laboratory facility is the victim of abuse and neglect, it is often not discovered until USDA does an inspection.

While not ideal, current regulations concerning animal welfare are better than USDA’s third-party inspection proposal. Please tell USDA to do its job and ditch third-party inspections.




In the News

Roadmap to Replace Animal Tests

The National Toxicology Program has released a “Strategic Roadmap” which outlines a new approach to evaluate the safety of chemicals and drugs, while reducing the number of animals used for such testing. The goal of this effort is to encourage the use of new technologies like computational models, biochips, and high-throughput screening, which deliver more reliable, applicable data. READ MORE »

Non-animal tests in China

While animal testing on cosmetics still occurs in China, the government has shown a willingness to accept non-animal safety testing methods. China’s pace to change has been slow, with obstacles, in large part, being a matter of practicality. For example, obtaining reliable alternatives can be difficult and training scientists to use alternatives takes time and resources. Nonetheless, there is reason to be optimistic. READ MORE »

Needless Monkey Business at Volkswagen

Earlier this month, AAVS President Sue Leary talked to The Dodo about animal experiments commissioned by Volkswagen, done in an attempt to refute the cancer risk associated with diesel fumes. Ten monkeys were kept in airtight containers for four hours, forced to breath diesel fumes while they watched cartoons. The tests were conducted by the Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, which as Sue explains, has long history of violating the Animal Welfare Act. READ MORE »